Neuroticism and disengagement coping are the strongest negative predictors of teacher wellbeing¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Neuroticism was the strongest negative predictor of hedonic, eudaimonic, and overall wellbeing (ρ = −.46 to −.48), and disengagement coping of general and occupational wellbeing (ρ = −.46 to −.48). → Sijing Zhou 2024

Evidence¶

Sijing Zhou 2024¶

Sijing Zhou, Gavin R. Slemp & Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick. (2024). Factors Associated with Teacher Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Results of the psychometric meta-analysis: "Neuroticism emerged as the strongest negative predictor of hedonic (ρ = −.46), eudaimonic (ρ = −.46), and overall wellbeing (ρ = −.48)" with disengagement coping strongest for general and occupational wellbeing.

"Neuroticism emerged as the strongest negative predictor of hedonic (ρ = −.46), eudaimonic (ρ = −.46), and overall wellbeing (ρ = −.48), whereas disengagement coping was strongly associated with both general wellbeing (ρ = −.46) and occupational wellbeing (ρ = −.48)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Personality Traits — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Hope is the strongest positive predictor of eudaimonic and overall teacher wellbeing (ρ = .75 and .76) — related
• Teacher-student relationships are the strongest interpersonal predictor of hedonic, occupational, and overall teacher wellbeing — related
• Autonomous motivation is the strongest positive predictor of hedonic teacher wellbeing (ρ = .83) — related
• Occupational commitment is the strongest positive consequence and turnover intentions the strongest negative consequence of teacher wellbeing — related