Most RCS Core Team members who completed the Inclusive Innovation Survey showed positive beliefs and efficacy aligned with the Inclusive Innovation Core Tenets¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The majority of the 11 IIS respondents gave positive responses to items measuring beliefs and confidence about collective leadership, co-research and co-design, context expertise, and continuity of equity. → Johnson 2023 (2)

Evidence¶

Johnson 2023¶

Johnson, A. M., & Lenderman, K. (2023). Socratic Circles: Building OER Tools for Racial Equity Classroom and Community Discourse. Digital Promise, Center for Inclusive Innovation. https://digitalpromise.org/inclusive-innovation doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/200

q2 · i? · design · r2

Inclusive Innovation Survey (a 15-item measure) completed by 11 RCS Core Team members, with items measured from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) and displayed in frequency bar graphs. The report states that members

"RCS Inclusive Innovation Core Team members also demonstrated positive responses to IIS items measuring their beliefs about collective leadership (Exhibit 16) and their confidence in their ability to use collective leadership in their work in the future (Exhibit 17)."

Johnson 2023 (2)¶

Johnson, A. M., & Lenderman, K. (2023). Socratic Circles: Building OER Tools for Racial Equity Classroom and Community Discourse. Digital Promise, Center for Inclusive Innovation. https://digitalpromise.org/inclusive-innovation. doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/200

q2 · i? · design · r2

The report's own interpretation of the disagree responses observed on some Context Expertise and Proximity and Continuity of Equity efficacy items in the IIS frequency graphs.

"It is possible that the above items required more nuance; and therefore, yielded the disagree responses."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Collaborative Innovation tenets varied in visibility: collective ownership and context expertise were most evidenced, reimagining progress least — related
• Centering teachers of color as leaders, designers, and implementers throughout design is the most broadly appreciated aspect of the Design Team process — related
• Serving as panelists or moderators increased educators' reported expertise, peer-support confidence, and leadership confidence — related
• Post-implementation survey responses after each Socratic Circles implementation cycle trended affirmative toward the team-defined outcomes — related
• District-community Core Team participants across four pilot districts perceived their co-designed solutions successfully met the team-defined intended outcomes — related