Students taught with the ILSC model show greater enhancement of mathematical critical thinking ability than students taught conventionally¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The enhancement (n-Gain) of mathematical critical thinking ability in the ILSC experimental class (0.48) was higher than in the conventional learning control class (0.42), with both gains in the medium category per Hake's criteria. → Husnaeni 2016 q2 i? Posttest MCTA mean scores were higher in the ILSC class (26.35) than in the control class (24.42), and pretest means also differed (9.45 vs 7.90). → Husnaeni 2016 (2)

Evidence¶

Husnaeni 2016¶

Husnaeni. (2016). The Enhancement of Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability of Aliyah Madrasas Student Model Using Gorontalo by Interactive Learning Setting Cooperative Model. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095328

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group study with 34 students per class at MAN Model Gorontalo. The n-Gain analysis showed "average MCTA students acquire learnin g by ILSC Models of 048 is higher than the average MCTA students who obtain the CL of 0.42", both categorized as medium improvement per Hake (1999).

"Likewise, average MCTA students acquire learnin g by ILSC Models of 048 is higher than the average MCTA students who obtain the CL of 0.42. Based on t he criteria of Hake (1999), an increase in the medi um category."

Husnaeni 2016 (2)¶

Husnaeni. (2016). The Enhancement of Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability of Aliyah Madrasas Student Model Using Gorontalo by Interactive Learning Setting Cooperative Model. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095328

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive comparison of mean pretest and posttest MCTA scores between the ILSC experimental class and the conventional learning control class, each with N=34. The ILSC class scored "26.35, higher than the a verage post-test students who received CL at 23.42".

"Overall, students who obtain teaching model has a m ean pretest MCTA with ILSC Models by 9.45 higher t han the average pretest MCTA students who obtain the CL of 7.90, and the mean posttest MCTA students acqui re learning by ILSC Models at 26.35, higher than the a verage post-test students who received CL at 23.42."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Student performance on the exploration aspect of mathematical critical thinking is the weakest across both ILSC and conventional learning groups — related
• Students taught Elementary Algebra with e-books showed significantly higher mathematical critical thinking gains than students taught with conventional textbooks — related
• Posttest critical thinking scores averaged 11.64 in the e-book class versus 9.41 in the control class, with pretest means of 4.42 and 4.31 — related
• The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test difference under conventional teaching — related
• Students taught with the LAPS-Heuristic model show higher critical thinking skills than students taught conventionally on demand and supply material in vocational economics — related
• Normalized gain in mathematical critical thinking was 0.83 in the e-book class versus 0.76 in the conventional-textbook class — related
• Junior high students taught with culture-based RME achieve higher post-test critical mathematical thinking scores than students taught with conventional mathematics education — related
• A debate model in yellow book learning can increase students' critical thinking skills relative to conventional learning models — related