IMR occurred mainly in less successful outcome groups and was absent or rare in more successful outcome groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? IMR amounted to 21.3% of MR turns in the less successful Finnish high school group versus 2.5% in the more successful group. → Iiskala 2021 q2 i? IMR was present at 1.8% in the less successful American engineering group but totally absent in the more successful group. → Iiskala 2021

Evidence¶

Iiskala 2021¶

Iiskala, T., Volet, S., Jones, C., Koretsky, M., & Vauras, M. (2021). Significance of forms and foci of metacognitive regulation in collaborative science learning of less and more successful outcome groups in diverse contexts. Instructional Science, 49, 687–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09558-1

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Table 5 reports IMR concentrated in less successful groups: 21.3% (high school) and 1.8% (engineering) versus 2.5% and 0% in more successful groups, described as "mostly IMR, especially concerning the less successful outcome group." Australian veterinary groups showed no IMR coded.

"The individual MR turns for Finnish high school science students were mostly IMR, especially concerning the less successful outcome group"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• MOR comprised the majority of social MR turns in both less and more successful outcome groups in Finnish senior high school science — related
• MR of less successful outcome groups focused more on low-level cognitive activity in Finnish high school and Australian veterinary contexts — related
• SSMR comprised the majority of social MR turns in both less and more successful outcome groups in Australian university veterinary science and American university engineering contexts — related
• American university engineering students showed the opposite foci pattern: the less successful group manifested more high-level MR than the more successful group — related
• Script-supported groups mainly engaged in accepted intra-group metacognitive interaction, with co-constructed interaction infrequent and highly variable between groups — related
• VMSR occurred at low levels across all groups and contexts — related
• In the engineering context, SSMR focus showed an opposite pattern to veterinary science: the less successful group had proportionally more SSMR-High than the more successful group — related