Jigsaw's advantage over conventional instruction held for both male and female students, with no significant main effect of treatment on gender¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? There was no significant main effect of treatment on students' gender; mean post scores differed little between females and males in either the jigsaw group (25.33 vs 24.67) or the control group (18.80 vs 19.48). → Ajitoni Sunday Olukayode & Salako 2014
Evidence¶
Ajitoni Sunday Olukayode & Salako 2014¶
Ajitoni Sunday Olukayode & Salako, Ekima Tina. (2014). Effect of Jigsaw Technique and Gender on Students' Attitude to Ethnic Integration and Sustainable Development in Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 4(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n3p46
q2 · i? · causal · r1
ANCOVA treatment*gender analysis in the same quasi-experiment (Table 3) failed to reject H02; the article reports descriptive means only, with no effect size printed, so impact is null.
"Based on table 3, there is no significant main effect of treatment on students' gender. There is not much observed difference between the mean score of the female and male students in the experimental group (24.67 and 25.33)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Achievement differences favor females over males under both teaching conditions, with a small effect — related
- Under concept mapping instruction, male students achieved significantly better than female students in trigonometry — related
- In a quasi-experiment on giving students prior topics and instructional objectives, Literature-in-English achievement did not differ significantly by gender in an ANCOVA across treatment and control students — related
- Male and female students taught Igbo language reading comprehension with the cloze approach do not differ significantly in achievement — related
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught basic science with concept mapping — related
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — related
- Under cooperative learning instruction, there was no statistically significant gender difference in trigonometry achievement, though female students scored higher on average — related
- The jigsaw group's post-test attitude mean (24.96) exceeded the conventional group's (17.65) in estimated marginal means — related
- Posttest achievement under jigsaw instruction did not differ significantly by gender — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.