Claims

Posttest achievement under jigsaw instruction did not differ significantly by gender

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Female (M=6.65, SD=2.15) and male (M=5.50, SD=2.52) students' posttest scores did not differ significantly (t(36)=1.51; p>0.05). → Akçay 2016

Evidence

Akçay 2016

Nilüfer Okur Akçay. (2016). Implementation of Cooperative Learning Model in Preschool. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p83

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Secondary analysis of the same study comparing female (n=20 pooled pre/post groups as printed) and male students' scores. The posttest gender comparison was "not significant (t(36)=1.51; p>0.05)"; no effect size is printed.

"It was determined that the arithmetic mean of the posttest results of the female students was 6.65 and standard deviation was 2.15; the arithmetic mean of the male students was 5.50 and the standard deviation was 2.52, and the difference between them was not significant (t(36)=1.51; p>0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.