Posttest achievement under jigsaw instruction did not differ significantly by gender¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Female (M=6.65, SD=2.15) and male (M=5.50, SD=2.52) students' posttest scores did not differ significantly (t(36)=1.51; p>0.05). → Akçay 2016
Evidence¶
Akçay 2016¶
Nilüfer Okur Akçay. (2016). Implementation of Cooperative Learning Model in Preschool. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p83
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Secondary analysis of the same study comparing female (n=20 pooled pre/post groups as printed) and male students' scores. The posttest gender comparison was "not significant (t(36)=1.51; p>0.05)"; no effect size is printed.
"It was determined that the arithmetic mean of the posttest results of the female students was 6.65 and standard deviation was 2.15; the arithmetic mean of the male students was 5.50 and the standard deviation was 2.52, and the difference between them was not significant (t(36)=1.51; p>0.05)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Jigsaw cooperative learning produces higher posttest achievement than traditional teaching for preschool sense-organs instruction — related
- Jigsaw's advantage over conventional instruction held for both male and female students, with no significant main effect of treatment on gender — related
- Male and female experimental groups did not differ significantly in reading comprehension at post-test after Telegram instruction — a broader claim this one bears on
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught with the demonstration method — a broader claim this one bears on
- No significant difference in listening performance between male and female students taught with suggestopedia — a broader claim this one bears on
- In a quasi-experiment on giving students prior topics and instructional objectives, Literature-in-English achievement did not differ significantly by gender in an ANCOVA across treatment and control students — related
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — related
- Under concept mapping instruction, male students achieved significantly better than female students in trigonometry — related
- The effect of games-based instruction on algebraic expressions achievement interacted significantly with gender, favoring male students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.