Claims

Cost, equipment availability, maintenance and faculty training are reported implementation barriers for laparoscopic simulation, especially in resource-constrained settings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Included implementation evidence maps barriers of cost, equipment availability, maintenance, faculty training, lack of standardized protocols and institutional inequalities, particularly relevant for Latin American and other resource-constrained contexts. → Vega Ochoa AD 2026

Evidence

Vega Ochoa AD 2026

Vega Ochoa AD, Pinto Bautista HL, Weber Ipuana WJ, González Cuello MÁ, Díaz Pérez A. (2026). Student perceptions of technology-enhanced simulation resources in laparoscopic training: a scoping review and implications for surgical instrumentation. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10009-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative mapping across included studies, notably the Wilkinson et al. systematic review of low- and middle-income countries and the Cuban low-cost trainer study. The review notes low-cost simulators and portable trainers may increase access but still require curricular planning, maintenance strategies and faculty development.

"Implementation barriers included cost, equipment availability, maintenance, faculty training, lack of standardized protocols and institutional inequalities"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.