Claims

Students taught with computer-based multimedia presentation significantly outperformed students taught by the conventional method on the post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test mean achievement of the CBMP group (16.45) was significantly higher than that of the conventional-method group (13.18), t-cal 6.31 exceeding the tabulated 1.99 at P<0.05. → Abiola Lateef Olori and Adekunle Olusegun Igbosanu 2016

Evidence

Abiola Lateef Olori and Adekunle Olusegun Igbosanu 2016

Abiola Lateef Olori and Adekunle Olusegun Igbosanu. (2016). Effect of Computer- Based Multimedia Presentation on Senior Secondary Students’ Achievement in Agricultural Science. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122547

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-test comparison of two intact classes (N=40 each) in a quasi-experimental design, analyzed by t-test (df 78). CBMP post-test mean 16.45 (SD 2.06) versus conventional 13.18 (SD 2.05); t-calculated 6.31 exceeded the tabulated value, so "the null hypothesis is rejected".

"Table 3 shows that there is significant difference (P<0.05) in students’ achievement scores in agricultural science when taught using Computer-Bas ed Multimedia Presentation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.