No significant direct effects exist between teachers' motivation to promote SRL and students' SRL motivation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The multilevel model found no significant direct paths from teachers' self-efficacy or attainment value to students' self-efficacy, values or cost. → Johannes Jud 2024
Evidence¶
Johannes Jud 2024¶
Johannes Jud, Yves Karlen, Carmen Nadja Hirt. (2024). Linking teachers' and students' motivation for self-regulated learning: is there a signal and how is it transmitted? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09393-y
q3 · i? · associational · r2
In the full-perspective MSEM (167 teachers, 2,785 students), the Results section reports that "no significant direct effects between teachers' and students' motivation could be found"; Table 2 direct-effect confidence intervals all include zero. Equivalence was not tested.
"Regarding RQ3, no significant direct effects between teachers' and students' motivation could be found (see Fig. 1; Table 2)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Motivation — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Teachers' self-efficacy for SRL promotion shows significant indirect effects on students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value via teacher- and student-reported SRL promotion, with no indirect path to cost — related
- Teachers' self-efficacy for SRL promotion, but not their attainment value, is positively related to their self-reported SRL promotion when both are modelled simultaneously — related
- Student-reported SRL promotion is associated with students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value for SRL at class and student levels, but not with perceived cost — related
- Including student-reported SRL promotion is critical for finding indirect teacher-to-student motivation links: teacher-report-only models show none, student-report-only models show significant indirect effects — related
- Student-reported SRL promotion is not significantly associated with students' perceived cost of using strategies at class level, and only negligibly (r = −.04) at student level — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-direct-teacher-student-motivation-effects |
title |
No significant direct effects exist between teachers' motivation to promote SRL and students' SRL motivation |
description |
No significant direct effects exist between teachers' motivation to promote SRL and students' SRL motivation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — johannes-jud-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.