Claims

No significant difference in distinction grades by teaching methodology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? There is no significant relation between teaching methodology and obtaining a distinction mark (Fisher exact test, p = .999). → Torres-Martín 2022

Evidence

Torres-Martín 2022

Torres-Martín, C., Acal, C., El-Homrani, M., & Mingorance-Estrada, Á. C. (2022). Implementation of the flipped classroom and its longitudinal impact on improving academic performance. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10095-y

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Fisher exact test on the Distinction (A) grade band for 522 traditional and 635 flipped classroom students (Table 6). The article reports "no relation between getting a distinction mark or not depending on the teaching method applied", with p = .999. Equivalence was not tested.

"There is no relation between getting a distinction mark or not depending on the teaching method applied. That is because the p value is higher than the usual level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-methodology-difference-distinction-grades
title No significant difference in distinction grades by teaching methodology
description No significant difference in distinction grades by teaching methodology
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — torres-martín-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.