Probability of failing is higher under traditional methodology¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The probability of failing the subject is 1.538 times greater when students are taught using the traditional method (Fisher exact test, p = .002). → Torres-Martín 2022

Evidence¶

Torres-Martín 2022¶

Torres-Martín, C., Acal, C., El-Homrani, M., & Mingorance-Estrada, Á. C. (2022). Implementation of the flipped classroom and its longitudinal impact on improving academic performance. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10095-y

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Fisher exact test on fail/pass categories for 522 traditional and 635 flipped classroom students (Table 6). The article reports the probability of failing is "1.538 greater" under traditional methodology, with relative risk 1.388.

"The probability of failing the subject is 1.538 greater when the student body has been given class using the traditional method. The fraction of failed students opposing those that managed to pass the subject is 1.388 times larger when they carried out their classes applying the traditional methodology."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cohorts taught with the flipped classroom earned significantly higher average grades than earlier cohorts taught traditionally, in a non-equivalent-groups comparison — related
• Probability of notable grades is substantially higher under flipped classroom methodology — related
• No significant difference in distinction grades by teaching methodology — related
• Teaching methodology has no effect on student withdrawal from the exam — related
• Probability of a passing grade (5–7) is higher under traditional methodology — related