Claims

Notification-hidden students showed longer average phone-use duration and no performance difference versus notification-revealed students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The NH group showed longer APUD than the NR group, but the difference was not significant (d = −0.290, p = .095). → Liao 2026 q3 i? Learning performance did not differ significantly between the NR and NH groups (d = −0.185, p = .399). → Liao 2026 (2)

Evidence

Liao 2026

Liao, H.-H., Liu, T.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2026). External and internal smartphone distractions: Effects on phone use and learning performance in college classrooms. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09794-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Welch-corrected t-test on average phone-use duration in the same two-group classroom experiment; the "difference was not significant" despite the NH group's longer mean duration (40.574 vs 25.764 s in Table 1).

"Although participants in the NH group showed a longer APUD than those in the NR group, the difference was not significant (alternative hypothesis: NR < NH; t = − 1.327, df = 56.552, p = .095, Cohen's d = − 0.290, H2 rejected)"

Liao 2026 (2)

Liao, H.-H., Liu, T.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2026). External and internal smartphone distractions: Effects on phone use and learning performance in college classrooms. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09794-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Welch-corrected t-test on the 16-item quiz in the same experiment found "a significant difference" was absent between groups; equivalence was not tested. Means were 8.071 (NR) and 8.667 (NH).

"the two groups did not have a significant difference in learning performance (Alternative hypothesis: NR ≠ NH; t = − 0.847, df = 81.601, p = .399, Cohen's d = − 0.185, H3 supported)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-performance-difference-notification-settings
title Notification-hidden students showed longer average phone-use duration and no performance difference versus notification-revealed students
description Notification-hidden students showed longer average phone-use duration and no performance difference versus notification-revealed students
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — liao-2026, liao-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.