Smartphone settings moderate how vigilance translates into phone use: vigilance raises checking frequency more when notifications are revealed, and use duration more when notifications are hidden¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 The positive effect of SV on PUF was stronger in the NR group than in the NH group (moderation β = −0.468, p = .001, f² = 0.106; group paths β = 0.477 vs 0.389). → Liao 2026
q3 i3 The positive effect of SV on APUD was stronger in the NH group than in the NR group (moderation β = 0.655, p = .006, f² = 0.124; group path β = 0.504 in NH only). → Liao 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Liao 2026¶
Liao, H.-H., Liu, T.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2026). External and internal smartphone distractions: Effects on phone use and learning performance in college classrooms. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09794-3
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
PLS-SEM moderation test on all 84 participants; the Group×SV interaction on phone-use frequency was significant, with the SV→PUF path stronger in NR (β = 0.477) than NH (β = 0.389).
"the positive effect of SV and PUF on the NR group was higher than that on the NH group (β = −0.468, p = .001, H8a supported)"
Liao 2026 (2)¶
Liao, H.-H., Liu, T.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2026). External and internal smartphone distractions: Effects on phone use and learning performance in college classrooms. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09794-3
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
PLS-SEM moderation test on all 84 participants; the Group×SV interaction on average phone-use duration was significant, with SV→APUD significant only in the NH group (β = 0.504, p < .001; NR β = 0.136, p = .593).
"the positive effect of SV and APUD on the NH group was higher than that on the NR group ( β = 0.655, p = .006, H8b supported)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Phone-use frequency and duration increase phone-use mental effort, which negatively affects learning performance, mediating the behavior–performance link
- Habitual phone use heightens smartphone vigilance but does not directly increase checking frequency; it lengthens use duration only when notifications are hidden — related
- Notification-hidden students showed longer average phone-use duration and no performance difference versus notification-revealed students — related
- Phone-use behavior under hidden notifications is highly heterogeneous: about half of NH students abstained entirely, and most NR checks were brief glances — related
- Students with visible notifications check their phones more frequently in class than students with hidden notifications — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
settings-moderate-vigilance-phone-use-link |
title |
Smartphone settings moderate how vigilance translates into phone use: vigilance raises checking frequency more when notifications are revealed, and use duration more when notifications are hidden |
description |
Smartphone settings moderate how vigilance translates into phone use: vigilance raises checking frequency more when notifications are revealed, and use duration more when notifications are hidden |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — liao-2026, liao-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.