Claims

Students learning organic chemistry with the OCRA mobile prototype scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught by traditional methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's post-test minimum score was significantly higher (p < .05) than the control group's. → Shariman and Talib 2017

Evidence

Shariman and Talib 2017

Tenku Putri Norishah Tenku Shariman and Othman Talib. (2017). OCRA, A Mobile Learning Prototype for Understanding Chemistry Concepts. 14th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2017). https://www.worldcat.org/isbn/978-989-8533-68-5

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 46 students per group in a Malaysian Science Foundation Introduction to Chemistry course; t-test on post-test achievement between groups. The experimental group mean was 62.24 versus 40.86 for the control group, and the article reports the difference as "significantly higher (p < .05)".

"Table 4 shows the minimum score for the experimental group is significantly higher (p < .05) compared to the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.