The control and experimental groups did not differ significantly on the pre-test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The two groups had the same level of pre-test achievement (p> .05), implying similar pre-knowledge of organic chemistry concepts. → Shariman and Talib 2017
Evidence¶
Shariman and Talib 2017¶
Tenku Putri Norishah Tenku Shariman and Othman Talib. (2017). OCRA, A Mobile Learning Prototype for Understanding Chemistry Concepts. 14th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2017). https://www.worldcat.org/isbn/978-989-8533-68-5
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Between-group t-test on pre-test achievement (control mean 22.62, SD 7.79; experimental mean 27.86, SD 7.00; t value -3.43) in the quasi-experiment; the article reports no significant difference, and equivalence was not formally tested.
"Table 3 shows that the two groups have the same level of achievement (p> .05) even though the minimum score for the experimental group is higher than the minimum score for the control group although there is only a difference of five marks."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both traditional teaching and the OCRA approach significantly improved pre-test to post-test achievement, with a larger gain in the OCRA group — related
- Experimental and control groups were academically equivalent on the organic chemistry achievement test before the treatment — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The two groups did not differ significantly on the pretest before instruction — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Groups were equivalent in mathematics achievement before the application — a broader claim this one bears on
- The experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent on the academic achievement pre-test before the intervention — a broader claim this one bears on
- The lecture and academic controversy groups showed no significant difference in TUCE pretest scores, indicating equivalent prior economic knowledge — related
- The GCR and control groups were equivalent in grammar performance before treatment — related
- The experiment and control groups were equivalent on the triangles achievement test before instruction — related
- Students learning organic chemistry with the OCRA mobile prototype scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught by traditional methods — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.