Claims

EFL students using Web 2.0 learner-created content scored significantly higher on a vocabulary post-test than a lecture-based control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After a twelve-week treatment, the experimental group's post-test mean (23.17) was statistically significantly higher than the control group's (17.5), t = 3.63, p = .001. → Eren 2015

Evidence

Eren 2015

Omer Eren. (2015). Vocabulary Learning on Learner-Created Content by Using Web 2.0 Tools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(4), 281-300. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105759

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study with 23 experimental and 22 control students analyzed by independent samples t-test in SPSS 15.0; Table 4 reports means of 23.17 vs 17.5, t = 3.63, p = .001, df = 43. The article reports "this difference is statistically significant".

"The post-test results show that there is a difference between mean scores of the experimental group and the control group , and this difference is statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.