Claims

Systematic review finds PBL contributes to clinical skill development in OB/GYN education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 6 studies examining clinical skill application, 5 (83.33%) demonstrated PBL made a greater contribution to clinical skill development than the comparison group. → Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Evidence

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto. (2025). Problem-based learning in obstetrics and gynecology: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12711243/

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Synthesis of clinical skill outcomes; the review reports that "PBL made a greater contribution to the development of clinical skills than the article's comparison group" in 5 of 6 studies, with one study finding no significant difference. No effect size was printed.

"5(83.33) have demonstrated that PBL made a greater contribution to the development of clinical skills than the article's comparison group while 1(16.6) were not able to demonstrate significant differences in this outcome."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.