Claims

Systematic review finds positive faculty satisfaction with PBL in OB/GYN education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Five studies (20.83%) showed the experience was deemed positive by professors who applied PBL structured steps. → Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Evidence

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto. (2025). Problem-based learning in obstetrics and gynecology: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12711243/

q2 · i? · review · r2

Synthesis of faculty satisfaction outcomes; the review reports that "the experience was deemed as positive by professors who have applied PBL structured steps" in 5 studies, mostly surveys. No effect size was printed.

"Considering faculty satisfaction, 5(20.83) of the studies have shown that the experience was deemed as positive by professors who have applied PBL structured steps."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.