Claims

Systematic review finds PBL improves clinical reasoning in OB/GYN education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In 9 of the reviewed investigations (33.33% of all included studies), students who underwent PBL's organized processes had improved clinical reasoning. → Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Evidence

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto. (2025). Problem-based learning in obstetrics and gynecology: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12711243/

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative synthesis of the included studies; the review reports that "students who underwent PBL's organized processes had improved clinical reasoning" in 9 investigations. No effect size was printed.

"In 9(33.33) of all investigations, it was found that students who underwent PBL's organized processes had improved clinical reasoning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.