Claims

Systematic review finds PBL superior for consolidating information in OB/GYN undergraduate education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the systematic review of 24 studies, 13 studies (54.16%) demonstrated PBL has a superior ability to consolidate information. → Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Evidence

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto 2025

Fernandes Ivan Filho; Rodrigues Cibele Isaac Saad; Korkes Henri Augusto; de Sampaio Luiz Ferraz Neto. (2025). Problem-based learning in obstetrics and gynecology: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12711243/

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive synthesis of 24 included studies in a systematic review registered on PROSPERO; the review reports that "13(54.16) have demonstrated that PBL has a superior ability to consolidate information." No pooled effect size was printed.

"In the selected sample, 13(54.16) have demonstrated that PBL has a superior ability to consolidate information."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.