Claims

PBL yields higher course examination scores than LBL in introductory Chinese undergraduate medical courses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across pooled controlled studies, the PBL experimental group produced significantly higher examination scores than the LBL control group (SMD = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63–1.01). → Zhang Yanqi 2015

Evidence

Zhang Yanqi 2015

Zhang Yanqi, Zhou Liang, Liu Xiaoyu, Liu Ling, Wu Yazhou, Zhao Zengwei, Yi Dali, Yi Dong. (2015). The Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning Teaching Model for Use in Introductory Chinese Undergraduate Medical Courses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120884

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 23 studies reporting examination scores, using a random effects model after high heterogeneity (I2 = 86%, P<0.001). The result shows "significantly higher examination scores than the LBL control group" with SMD = 0.82, a medium-to-large standardized effect.

"The analytical results reveal that the experimental group produced significantly higher examination scores than the LBL control group [SMD: 0.82, 95% CI: (0.63, 1.01)]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.