Claims

TBL significantly increases medical students' theoretical examination scores compared with LBL in Chinese medical education (pooled SMD = 2.46)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Across 13 studies including 1545 participants, TBL significantly increased students' theoretical examination scores when compared with lecture-based learning (SMD = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.53–3.40). → Chen Minjian 2018

Evidence

Chen Minjian 2018

Chen Minjian, Ni Chunhui, Hu Yanhui, Wang Meilin, Liu Lu, Ji Xiaoming, Chu Haiyan, Wu Wei, Lu Chuncheng, Wang Shouyu, Wang Shoulin, Zhao Liping, Li Zhong, Zhu Huijuan, Wang Jianming, Xia Yankai, Wang Xinru. (2018). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis pooling theoretical examination scores from 13 studies (1545 participants) comparing TBL with LBL in Chinese medical education, using a random-effects model. The pooled estimate was "SMD = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.53–3.40" with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.0%).

"We found that TBL significantly increased students’ examination scores when compared with LBL in random-effects model (SMD = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.53–3.40, I2 = 98.0%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.