Learners from different performance groups differ in priorities of learning tactic usage across learning sessions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Process mining of tactic usage across learning sessions revealed that learners from different performance groups had different priorities in tactic use. → Yizhou Fan 2021

Evidence¶

Yizhou Fan 2021¶

Yizhou Fan, Wannisa Matcha, Nora’ayu Ahmad Uzir, Qiong Wang, Dragan Gašević. (2021). Learning Analytics to Reveal Links Between Learning Design and Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31, 980–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00249-z

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Process mining (bupaR, Heuristic Miner) of tactic sequences across sessions for 8,788 learners, of whom 65.13% were in the High-performance group, 14.76% Medium, and 13.03% Low. The analysis "revealed that learners from different performance groups had different priorities".

"The analysis of tactics’ usage across learning sessions revealed that learners from different performance groups had different priorities."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Content and assessment oriented tactic is a distinct, integrated tactic rather than a simple combination of content and assessment tactics — related
• High-performance learners show stronger alignment of learning tactic choices with the tasks provided in the learning design — related
• Learning tactics shaped by instructional cues are embedded in different units of study in the MOOC — related
• Cluster analysis of MOOC trace data identifies four learning tactics: Search oriented, Content and assessment oriented, Content oriented, and Assessment oriented — related
• Process mining shows low performers access solutions more and transition to hints after incorrect submissions more than high performers — related
• Process mining showed LPK students began with preparatory tasks and achieved a higher proportion of correct decisions, while HPK students skipped preparation and increasingly took advanced tasks — related