Claims

The postpolicy retention effect on dropout was smaller than the prepolicy retention relationship, but its systemwide impact was larger

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Prepolicy retained students' dropout rates were 25.3 percentage points larger than similar nonretained prepolicy students, a much stronger relationship than the postpolicy retention effect. → Allensworth 2004

Evidence

Allensworth 2004

Allensworth, E. (2004). Ending Social Promotion: Dropout Rates in Chicago after Implementation of the Eighth-Grade Promotion Gate. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/ending-social-promotion-dropout-rates-chicago-after-implementation-eighth-grade

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The same statistical models estimating the postpolicy effect were applied to prepolicy cohorts. The report explains prepolicy retainees were a very select group (less than 2 percent), whereas many more postpolicy students were retained, giving retention a larger total systemwide impact.

"retained students in prepolicy cohorts had dropout rates that were 25.3 percentage points larger than nonretained prepolicy students with similar demographic and achievement characteristics (55.7 percent, compared to 30.4 percent)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id postpolicy-retention-effect-smaller-but-larger-impact
title The postpolicy retention effect on dropout was smaller than the prepolicy retention relationship, but its systemwide impact was larger
description The postpolicy retention effect on dropout was smaller than the prepolicy retention relationship, but its systemwide impact was larger
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2004
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — allensworth-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.