Before treatment, the experimental and control groups were equivalent on both achievement and attitude¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pre-test achievement scores did not differ significantly between Experimental Group I and Control Group I. → Çifçi 2016 q2 i? Pre-treatment attitude scores did not differ significantly between Experimental Group I and Control Group I. → Çifçi 2016 (2)

Evidence¶

Çifçi 2016¶

Taner Çifçi. (2016). Effects of Infographics on Students Achievement and Attitude towards Geography Lessons. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n1p154

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent samples t-test of pre-test achievement scores for Experimental Group I (X = 42.92) versus Control Group I (X = 43.92), finding "not a significant difference between pre-test scores".

"When Table 4 is examined, it is seen that there is not a significant difference between pre-test scores of the students on the achievement test [t (52) = -.322; p > .05]."

Çifçi 2016 (2)¶

Taner Çifçi. (2016). Effects of Infographics on Students Achievement and Attitude towards Geography Lessons. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n1p154

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent samples t-test of pre-treatment ASGL scores for Experimental Group I (X = 3.09) versus Control Group I (X = 3.05), reporting "not a statisti cally significant difference" between the groups.

"According to the results of the analysis given in Tabl e 12, there is not a statisti cally significant difference between the pre-treatment attitude scores of the experimental group I and the control group I [t (52) = .689; p > .05]."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Using infographics in geography lessons improves students' attitudes towards the geography lesson relative to usual instruction — related
• Before the FCI treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in writing ability — related
• The experiment and control groups were equivalent on the triangles achievement test before instruction — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on the pre test — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• The control and experimental groups did not differ significantly on the pre-test — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• The flipped and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test achievement scores — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Experimental and control groups were homogeneous in idiom knowledge before treatment — related
• The music and non-music groups did not differ significantly on the mathematics achievement pretest — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related