The flipped and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test achievement scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? An unrelated t-test on pre-test scores found no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups, establishing baseline equivalence. → Cabi 2018
Evidence¶
Cabi 2018¶
Emine Cabi. (2018). The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185114
q2 · i? · causal · r2
An unrelated t-test compared pre-test scores of the experimental (n=28) and control (n=31) groups before treatment; the article reports t(57)=0.71, p>0.05, and concludes both groups could participate in the experimental process. No effect size is printed.
"Table 4 displays that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the students (t(57)=0.71, p> 0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
- Before the FCI treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in writing ability — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
- The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on the pre test — related
- Before implementation, treatment students performed significantly below control students on the standardized reading test — related
- The experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent on the academic achievement pre-test before the intervention — related
- Before treatment, the experimental and control groups were equivalent on both achievement and attitude — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.