Claims

The flipped and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test achievement scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? An unrelated t-test on pre-test scores found no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups, establishing baseline equivalence. → Cabi 2018

Evidence

Cabi 2018

Emine Cabi. (2018). The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185114

q2 · i? · causal · r2

An unrelated t-test compared pre-test scores of the experimental (n=28) and control (n=31) groups before treatment; the article reports t(57)=0.71, p>0.05, and concludes both groups could participate in the experimental process. No effect size is printed.

"Table 4 displays that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the students (t(57)=0.71, p> 0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.