Claims

Experiment and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test scores before the critical thinking treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A t-test on pre-test score means found the two groups were not statistically significantly different. → Abdullah et al. 2010

Evidence

Abdullah et al. 2010

Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah, Naser Jamil Alzaidiyeen, Ng Mooi Yee. (2010). The Practices of Critical Thinking Component and Its Impact in Malaysian Nurses Health Education. International Education Studies, 3(1). https://journals.ccsenet.org/index.php/ies

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Static-group comparison design; Levene's test and t-test on pre-test vignette scores showed the groups were "non statistically significant" (t = –0.257, p = 0.789), which the article states allowed further analysis. Equivalence was not formally tested.

"The results from Table 1 shows that the two groups were non statistically significant (F=0.049; p = 0.825) with t value –0.257 (p=0.789)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.