SBSM students outperformed both control groups and district/state averages on FITNESSGRAM passing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 60.9% of participating 7th/9th graders passed vs control-group rates of 34.9% to 47.6% in the same five schools. → Loukaitou-Sideris 2015
Evidence¶
Loukaitou-Sideris 2015¶
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Targeting the Body and the Mind: Evaluation of a P.E. Curriculum Intervention for Adolescents. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.873
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Comparison with non-participating 7th/9th grade classes in the same five schools and with LAUSD/state averages; study group passed at higher rates.
"Thus, 60.9% of participating students from these two grades passed the FITNESSGRAM, while the passing rates of the control groups ranged from 34.9% to 47.6%."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The SBSM curriculum significantly improved FITNESSGRAM performance, with passing rates rising from 20% to 60% — related
- The SBSM P.E. curriculum significantly increased student enjoyment of P.E. among Los Angeles inner-city adolescents — related
- Both groups improved from pretest to posttest, with most experimental students passing the KKM threshold of 60 — related
- Teachers rated the SBSM curriculum highly effective and observed higher student participation than prior curricula — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.