Claims

The SBSM curriculum significantly improved FITNESSGRAM performance, with passing rates rising from 20% to 60%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among 389 matched students, passing rose from 20% to 60% after the curriculum; paired t-test significant (p<0.05). → Loukaitou-Sideris 2015

Evidence

Loukaitou-Sideris 2015

Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Targeting the Body and the Mind: Evaluation of a P.E. Curriculum Intervention for Adolescents. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.873

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Analysis of FITNESSGRAM scores for 389 matched pre/post students; McNemar's test applied; average scores improved on all six tests.

"While only 20% of the students passed the test prior to the initiation of the curriculum, 60% did so after its completion."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.