Claims

Teachers rated the SBSM curriculum highly effective and observed higher student participation than prior curricula

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? All eight teachers assessed the curriculum as 'highly effective' and credited it with improved fitness and knowledge. → Loukaitou-Sideris 2015

Evidence

Loukaitou-Sideris 2015

Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Targeting the Body and the Mind: Evaluation of a P.E. Curriculum Intervention for Adolescents. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.873

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Pre/post face-to-face interviews with the eight P.E. teachers who delivered the curriculum; qualitative self-report data.

"All teachers assessed the SBSM curriculum as “highly effective” and credited it with an overall improvement in the fitness of their students, and making them more knowledgeable about physical activity and exercise."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.