Procedure-related complications do not differ significantly between simulation-based and non-simulation based training groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Three studies reporting procedure-related complications found no statistically significant differences between SBT and NSBT groups; four studies reported no significant adverse effects in either group. → Sun Yanxia 2017

Evidence¶

Sun Yanxia 2017¶

Sun Yanxia, Pan Chuxiong, Li Tianzuo, Gan Tong J. (2017). Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0313-7

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Narrative synthesis of complication outcomes across seven studies; pooling was deemed impossible due to heterogeneous reporting of outcomes and methods. Three studies reporting complications such as pain, bleeding and esophageal intubation found no statistically significant differences.

"Three studies [13, 19, 20] reported procedure-related complications (e.g. pain, bleeding, esophageal intubation) and found no statistically significant differences in complications between SBT and NSBT groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Simulation-based training does not significantly improve success rate of procedure completion on patients compared with non-simulation based training — related
• Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for time-skill in airway management — related
• Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for knowledge acquisition in airway management — related
• Simulation-based training produces a small improvement in behavior performance compared with non-simulation based training for airway management — related