Simulation-based training does not significantly improve success rate of procedure completion on patients compared with non-simulation based training¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Pooling four studies assessing success rate of procedure completion on patients found RR 1.26 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.66), indicating no significant difference between SBT and NSBT. → Sun Yanxia 2017
Evidence¶
Sun Yanxia 2017¶
Sun Yanxia, Pan Chuxiong, Li Tianzuo, Gan Tong J. (2017). Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0313-7
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-analysis of four trials assessing learner skill acquisition on patients or volunteers. The "risk ratio (RR) was 1.26 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.66)", indicating no significant difference between SBT and NSBT groups; equivalence was not tested.
"Four studies [8, 9, 13, 18] provided success rate of procedure completion. The risk ratio (RR) was 1.26 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.66), indicating no significant difference between SBT and NSBT groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Virtual endoscopy simulator training shows no statistically significant benefit for independent procedure completion in colonoscopy training (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.88–1.37, P=0.41) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Procedure-related complications do not differ significantly between simulation-based and non-simulation based training groups — related
- Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for knowledge acquisition in airway management — related
- Virtual endoscopy simulator training is superior to no-simulator control for independent procedure completion in gastroscopy training of novices (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13–1.39, P<0.0001) — reports the opposite
- Competency-based simulation effects are large for skills measured in the simulation lab but small and non-significant for clinical behaviors and patient outcomes — related
- Simulation-based training shows no significant benefit over non-simulation based training for time-skill in airway management — related
- Simulation-based training produces a small improvement in behavior performance compared with non-simulation based training for airway management — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.