Self-assessed abilities are uncorrelated with actual performance measures, and Kirkpatrick level 1 is generally not recommended¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Self-assessed abilities are uncorrelated with actual performance measures, and self-assessment (Kirkpatrick level 1) is generally not recommended in medical education studies. → Nielsen Martine Siw 2025
Evidence¶
Nielsen Martine Siw 2025¶
Nielsen Martine Siw, Ilkjær Frederik Veitland, Grejs Anders Morten, Nielsen Anders Bo, Konge Lars, Brøchner Anne Craveiro. (2025). Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial space access: a scoping review of educational approaches to lumbar puncture, epidural anaesthesia, and spinal anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.06.008
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's discussion states that "self-assessed abilities are uncorrelated with actual performance measures", underpinning its recommendation against relying on Kirkpatrick level 1 outcomes.
"Kirkpatrick level 1, being self-assessment, is generally not recommended in medical education studies, as studies of self-assessment have shown that self-assessed abilities are uncorrelated with actual performance measures."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students' self-reported perception of peer assessment's benefit is virtually uncorrelated with their actual measured benefit — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Perceived usefulness of ChatGPT, an invalid cue, is associated with overestimation of performance — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teachers' self-reported AI literacy correlates only weakly with their objectively measured performance (r = 0.07–0.24) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Prior physics knowledge moderated the correlation between feeling of learning and actual test performance (positive interaction, P < 0.05) — related
- No included SDL studies measured Kirkpatrick Level 4 (patient/system) outcomes — related
- Reviewed peer-tutoring simulation studies mostly reached only Kirkpatrick Level 2, with no assessment of behavior change or clinical-practice results — related
- Improvements in objective knowledge outcomes (Kirkpatrick Level 2) from technology-enhanced learning were inconsistent across neuroanatomy interventions — related
- Simulation-based training enhances outcomes across multiple Kirkpatrick levels in neuraxial space access education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.