Claims

On a motor transfer test, self-controlled knowledge-of-results groups estimated their outcomes more accurately than yoked groups, and among self-controlled groups Self-After and Self-Both were more accurate than Self-Before.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In transfer, only the main effect for Choice on absolute difference was significant (F(1,42) = 19.29, p< 0.001, ηp2 = 0.31): self-controlled groups (M = 14.68) were more accurate than Yoked groups (M = 23.67). → Carter 2014 q3 i3 A separate one-way ANOVA across the three self-controlled groups (F(2,21) = 5.24, p= 0.014, ηp2 = 0.33) found Self-After (M = 12.19) and Self-Both (M = 12.73) did not differ but both were more accurate than Self-Before (M = 19.12). → Carter 2014 (2)

Evidence

Carter 2014

Carter, M. J., Carlsen, A. N., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2014). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01325

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Laboratory experiment in which university volunteers learned a slider-positioning task under six knowledge-of-results (KR) conditions; transfer AD was analysed with a 2 × 3 ANOVA. "only the main effect for Choice was significant, F(1,42) = 19.29, p< 0.001, ηp2 = 0.31", with self-controlled groups more accurate than Yoked groups.

"In transfer, only the main effect for Choice was significant, F(1,42) = 19.29, p< 0.001, ηp2 = 0.31, with post hoc analysis indicating the self-controlled groups (M = 14.68, SE = 1.14) were significantly more accurate than the Yoked groups (M = 23.67, SE = 1.76)."

Carter 2014 (2)

Carter, M. J., Carlsen, A. N., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2014). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01325

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Follow-up one-way ANOVA restricted to the three self-controlled groups of the same experiment: "a significant main effect, F(2,21) = 5.24, p= 0.014, ηp2 = 0.33", with Self-After and Self-Both both more accurate than Self-Before.

"The analysis revealed a significant main effect, F(2,21) = 5.24, p= 0.014, ηp2 = 0.33, where post hoc tests revealed no differences between the Self-After (M = 12.19, SE = 1.86) and Self-Both (M = 12.73, SE = 1.79) groups, but both were significantly more accurate than the Self-Before group (M = 19.12, SE, 1.34)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-controlled-kr-groups-estimate-transfer-outcomes-more-accurately-than-yoked
title On a motor transfer test, self-controlled knowledge-of-results groups estimated their outcomes more accurately than yoked groups, and among self-controlled groups Self-After and Self-Both were more accurate than Self-Before.
description On a motor transfer test, self-controlled knowledge-of-results groups estimated their outcomes more accurately than yoked groups, and among self-controlled groups Self-After and Self-Both were more accurate than Self-...
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — carter-2014, carter-2014-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.