Claims

Experimental and control groups were equivalent in short story writing before the treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A pre-test t-test found no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups' mean short story writing scores. → Salem Saleh Khalaf Ibnian 2010

Evidence

Salem Saleh Khalaf Ibnian 2010

Salem Saleh Khalaf Ibnian. (2010). The Effect of Using the Story-Mapping Technique on Developing Tenth Grade Students' Short Story Writing Skills in EFL. English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 4. http://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pre-test equivalence check on both groups (42 each) before treatment. Table 5 prints means of 30.91 (experimental) and 30.37 (control), T = 0.392, p = 0.697; no effect size is printed, so the non-significant result is reported without one.

"Results of the test showed that the two groups were equivalent in their short story writing skills. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of both groups"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.