Claims

Taste-testing showed large effects on behavioral outcomes but was usually combined with other experiential strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Taste-testing demonstrated a large effect on behavioral outcomes across both age groups, but was often applied together with sensory evaluation, food preparation, cooking and/or gardening. → Varman Sumantla D. 2021

Evidence

Varman Sumantla D. 2021

Varman Sumantla D., Cliff Dylan P., Jones Rachel A., Hammersley Megan L., Zhang Zhiguang, Charlton Karen, Kelly Bridget. (2021). Experiential Learning Interventions and Healthy Eating Outcomes in Children: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010824

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Review synthesis: taste-testing (used in 19 of 25 studies) "demonstrated a large effect on behavioral outcomes" but was typically combined with other strategies. Two studies with taste-testing alone reported small effects, attributed to lower intensity, low adherence, combined nutrition education, and smaller samples.

"Taste-testing was also commonly used in studies across both age groups and demonstrated a large effect on behavioral outcomes [42,61] however, it was often applied together with sensory evaluation, food preparation, cooking and/or gardening."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.