Latent profile analysis identifies three career adapt-abilities subgroups (low, moderate, high) among English majors¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A three-profile solution was optimal: low (41.0%), moderate (51.2%), and high (7.8%) career adapt-abilities groups, with LMR-LRT non-significant beyond three profiles. → Wang X 2026
Evidence¶
Wang X 2026¶
Wang X (2026) The impact of career adapt-abilities on AI anxiety among English majors: a dual perspective analysis based on core self-evaluations at the person- and variable-centered. Front. Psychol. 17:1767791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1767791
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Latent profile analysis in Mplus 8.3 with the 24 Career Adapt-Abilities Scale items as indicators; models with 2 to 5 profiles were fitted. The "3-profile model had proportions of 41.0, 51.2, and 7.8%" and the highest entropy (0.952).
"Regarding profile sizes, the 3-profile model had proportions of 41.0, 51.2, and 7.8%, all exceeding the 5% minimum threshold for meaningful interpretation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Latent career adapt-abilities profiles differ in AI anxiety, with the low group most anxious and the high group least anxious — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Latent career adapt-abilities profiles differ strongly in core self-evaluations, with a stepwise increase across low, moderate, and high groups — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Three academic self-efficacy profiles (low, moderate, high) are identified among university students with motor disabilities using Latent Profile Analysis — related
- Profile sizes: 29.4% low, 41.2% moderate, and 29.4% high academic self-efficacy among students with motor disabilities — related
- Latent learner profiles did not moderate the effectiveness of the adaptive ITS — related
- Latent profile analysis of 2015 PISA data identifies four collaborative problem-solver profiles among Chinese 15-year-old students — related
- Three latent profiles of psychological adaptation to AI-assisted Japanese learning (maladaptive, moderate, positive) are identified at each of three waves — related
- Career adapt-abilities significantly and negatively predict AI anxiety among English majors — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
three-career-adapt-abilities-latent-profiles-english-majors |
title |
Latent profile analysis identifies three career adapt-abilities subgroups (low, moderate, high) among English majors |
description |
Latent profile analysis identifies three career adapt-abilities subgroups (low, moderate, high) among English majors |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wang-x-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.