Claims

TIPS-trained teams more often documented reductions in office discipline referrals at follow-up, with no group difference in the final year

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q4
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? At O3, significantly more Immediate Group teams than Waitlist teams documented a reduction in ODRs per 100 students. → Horner 2018 q4 i? No difference between groups in ODR reduction was evident for the final year (O4). → Horner 2018

Evidence

Horner 2018

Horner, R. H., Newton, J. S., Todd, A. W., Algozzine, B., Algozzine, K., Cusumano, D., & Preston, A. (2018). A Randomized Waitlist Controlled Analysis of Team-Initiated Problem Solving Professional Development and Use. Behavioral Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917745638

q4 · i? · causal · r2

School outcomes analysis using SWIS summaries of major ODRs per month across 38 schools in a randomized waitlist controlled trial. The article reports the O3 contrast as "statistically significant (χ2 = 4.39, df = 1, p = .04)" with no effect size printed.

"16 of 19 (84%) IM teams documented a reduction in ODRs per 100 students compared with 10 of 19 (53%) WL teams documenting a reduction in ODRs per 100 students at O 3, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.39, df = 1, p = .04)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.