Claims

Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after incentive payments ended

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Retention of transferred high-performing teachers persisted beyond the incentive period: most TTI teachers remained on the job even after payments ended. → Steven Glazerman 2013

Evidence

Steven Glazerman 2013

Steven Glazerman, Ali Protik, Bing-ru Teh, Julie Bruch, Jeffrey Max. (2013). Transfer Incentives for High-Performing Teachers: Final Results from a Multisite Randomized Experiment. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r?

A key finding of the TTI evaluation report, from the multisite randomized experiment conducted 2007-2014, is that "Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after payments ended."

"Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after payments ended."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tti-teachers-retained-after-payments
title Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after incentive payments ended
description Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after incentive payments ended
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
recheck_by 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — steven-glazerman-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.