Claims

Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after transfer payments ended

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Retention of transferred teachers persisted beyond the incentive period: most TTI teachers remained on the job after payments ended. → Steven Glazerman 2012

Evidence

Steven Glazerman 2012

Steven Glazerman, Ali Protik, Bing-ru Teh, Julie Bruch, Neil Seftor. (2012). Moving High-Performing Teachers: Implementation of Transfer Incentives in Seven Districts. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Intermediate impact reported in the TTI evaluation's key findings: teacher retention continued after the $20,000 payments concluded. The page prints no retention rate or effect size.

"Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after payments ended."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tti-teachers-stayed-after-payments-ended
title Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after transfer payments ended
description Most TTI teachers stayed on the job even after transfer payments ended
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — steven-glazerman-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.