The VFT group outperformed the conventional group on all three item types, while the conventional group improved only on objective items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The article concludes the VFT group achieved higher on objective, structured and essay items, whereas the conventional group showed improvement only on objective items. → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015
Evidence¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The authors' summary in the Discussion of the item-type results from Tables 4-9 of the quasi-experiment, contrasting the VFT group's gains across objective, structured and essay items with the conventional group's improvement on objective items only. No effect size is printed.
"Students who use VFT have a higher achievement in all three types of items which are the objectives, structured and essay than students taught using conventional methods which only showed improvement in objective items."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on the essay item for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on objective items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on structured items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- A significant Group x Time interaction indicates the VFT group's overall achievement improved more from pre-test to post-test than the conventional group's — related
- Students taught with a VFT module show significantly higher overall achievement gains than students taught with conventional methods for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.