Claims

A significant Group x Time interaction indicates the VFT group's overall achievement improved more from pre-test to post-test than the conventional group's

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The two-way ANOVA found a significant interaction between group and time on overall achievement (F = 35.837, sig = 0.000). → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015 q2 i? Figure 1 depicts the VFT group showing a higher pre-to-post improvement in overall achievement than the conventional group. → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015 (2)

Evidence

Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015

Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Omnibus interaction from the two-way ANOVA in Table 3 of the quasi-experiment (n=60): the Group x Time term was significant. The article prints F = 35.837 and sig = 0.000 in Table 3 but no effect size.

"The findings also show that there is a significant interaction between group and time of the overall achievement. Because there are significant interactions then the form of increased for pre - and post -test scores is describe d as shown in Figure 1 below."

Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015 (2)

Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The plotted pre/post means in Figure 1 of the same quasi-experiment show the treatment group's gain exceeding the control group's gain on overall achievement. The article describes this pattern in text accompanying the figure; no effect size is printed.

"Figure: 1 shows that students taught using VFT showed a higher improvement in overall achievement than the students taught using conventional method s."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.