A significant Group x Time interaction indicates the VFT group's overall achievement improved more from pre-test to post-test than the conventional group's¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The two-way ANOVA found a significant interaction between group and time on overall achievement (F = 35.837, sig = 0.000). → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015
q2 i? Figure 1 depicts the VFT group showing a higher pre-to-post improvement in overall achievement than the conventional group. → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Omnibus interaction from the two-way ANOVA in Table 3 of the quasi-experiment (n=60): the Group x Time term was significant. The article prints F = 35.837 and sig = 0.000 in Table 3 but no effect size.
"The findings also show that there is a significant interaction between group and time of the overall achievement. Because there are significant interactions then the form of increased for pre - and post -test scores is describe d as shown in Figure 1 below."
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015 (2)¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The plotted pre/post means in Figure 1 of the same quasi-experiment show the treatment group's gain exceeding the control group's gain on overall achievement. The article describes this pattern in text accompanying the figure; no effect size is printed.
"Figure: 1 shows that students taught using VFT showed a higher improvement in overall achievement than the students taught using conventional method s."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The VFT group outperformed the conventional group on all three item types, while the conventional group improved only on objective items — related
- Students taught with a VFT module show significantly higher overall achievement gains than students taught with conventional methods for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on the essay item for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on structured items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on objective items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
- Learning style and form of teaching show no statistically significant interaction effect on university students' academic achievement — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.