VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on structured items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Two-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in structured-item achievement between the VFT and conventional groups (F = 64.246, sig = 0.000). → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015
Evidence¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Two-way ANOVA on structured-item scores (three medium/high-level questions) in the quasi-experiment; treatment post-test mean 60.47 versus control 18.87 (Table 6). The article prints F =64.246 and sig= 0.000; no effect size is reported.
"Table: 7 shows significant differences in the mean sc ores of achievement for the structured itemsfor students taught using VFT with students taught using convent ional methods for the topicof Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems with the value of F =64.246 and sig= 0.000 (p <0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The VFT group outperformed the conventional group on all three item types, while the conventional group improved only on objective items — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- A significant Group x Time interaction indicates the VFT group's overall achievement improved more from pre-test to post-test than the conventional group's — related
- Students taught with a VFT module show significantly higher overall achievement gains than students taught with conventional methods for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — a broader claim this one bears on
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on the essay item for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on objective items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.