VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on objective items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Two-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in objective-item achievement between the VFT and conventional groups (F = 22.916, sig = 0.000). → Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015
Evidence¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN 2015¶
Norbaizura HARIS & Kamisah OSMAN. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Virtual Field Trip (VFT) Module in Learning Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092841
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Two-way ANOVA on objective-item scores (fifteen low-level knowledge/understanding questions) in the same quasi-experiment; treatment post-test mean was 89.33 versus control 57.78 (Table 4). The article prints F=22 916 and sig=0.000; no effect size is reported.
"Table: 5 shows that there is significant difference in t he achievement of the objective itemsfor students taught using VFT with students taught using conventional methods for the topicof Colonization and Succession in Mangrove E cosystems with the value of F=22 916 and sig=0.000 (p <0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The VFT group outperformed the conventional group on all three item types, while the conventional group improved only on objective items — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- A significant Group x Time interaction indicates the VFT group's overall achievement improved more from pre-test to post-test than the conventional group's — related
- Students taught with a VFT module show significantly higher overall achievement gains than students taught with conventional methods for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — a broader claim this one bears on
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on the essay item for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
- VFT-taught students significantly outperformed conventionally taught students on structured items for Colonization and Succession in Mangrove Ecosystems — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.