VR design review simulation improves construction students' error detection compared with 2D drawings¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students using a VR Design Review Simulation detected a notably higher number of errors than students reviewing 2D drawings. → Zia Ud Din 2024

Evidence¶

Zia Ud Din 2024¶

Zia Ud Din, Payam Mohammad, Rachael Sherman. (2024). A systematic review and analysis of the viability of virtual reality (VR) in construction work and education. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5059219

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The review reports, citing Kandi et al., that a VR game Design Review Simulation "significantly enhanced the ability of students to identify mistakes" versus 2D drawings. No effect size is printed.

"a game Design Review Simulation in VR significantly enhanced the ability of students to identify mistakes, with results showing that they detected a notably higher number of errors compared to reviewing 2D drawings [21]."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• VR improves motivation and performance of civil engineering students in a concrete structures course compared with traditional 2D drawings — related
• Immersion principle: people do not necessarily learn better in 3D immersive virtual reality than with a corresponding 2D desktop presentation (d = -0.10 across 9 tests) — reports the opposite
• 3D VR co-creation forms a more connected, centralized, and reciprocal aggregate social network with fewer cliques than 2D digital co-creation — related
• A randomized controlled trial found VR and conventional 2D approaches both improved orthognathic diagnosis and treatment planning understanding with no significant difference between groups — related