Claims

Students using WeChat public account based mobile learning achieved significantly higher mid-term literature test scores than control group students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experiment group's mid-term mean score (83.27) was significantly higher than the control group's (73.75), with a 2-tailed significance of 0.002. → Dai et al. 2018

Evidence

Dai et al. 2018

Guiyu Dai, Yang Liu & Shanmeng Cui. (2018). A Study on the Mobile Learning of English and American Literature Based on Wechat Public Account. English Language Teaching, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n6p47

q2 · i? · causal · r2

A control experiment with 97 junior undergraduates randomly assigned to experiment (n=49) and control (n=48) groups. The experiment group used WeChat public account resources to supplement classroom teaching. The mid-term independent samples t-test showed a 2-tailed significance of 0.002, below 0.05, so "the experiment group gets higher score than the control group".

"Experiment group’s mean is 83.27, higher than the control group’s mean (73.75), which is shown in Table 3."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.