Skip to content

Guided inquiry learning model via Liewelyin's six-stage inquiry cycle

Design · All designs
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 causal), q3 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

The article implements guided inquiry as a six-stage inquiry cycle from Liewelyin (2002): "(1) Inquisition - starting from the statement to be investigated, (2) Acquisition - enabling a brainstorming procedure, (3) Supposition - identifying the statement to be tested, (4) Implementation - designing and carrying out a plan, (5) Summation - collecting evidence and drawing conclusions, and (6) Exhibition - sharing and communicating results." It was delivered over 12 meetings to fifth-grade science classes, with the teacher acting as facilitator rather than transmitting knowledge directly.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Students lack prior inquiry experience, so the guided format with teacher-posed questions and structured stages is used
  • Assessment during inquiry is continuous, using observation sheets, portfolio, and report product assessment

Constraints

  • The article reports the model favored reflective-style students; impulsive students showed no significant advantage over conventional teaching

Target Learners

  • fifth-grade elementary school students

Learning Goals

  • science learning achievement
  • scientific process skills such as predicting, experimenting, concluding, and communicating

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Margunayasa, I G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., & Suastra, I W. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning and Cognitive Style on Science Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737-750. https://www.e-iji.net
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id guided-inquiry-six-stage-cycle-liewelyin
title Guided inquiry learning model via Liewelyin's six-stage inquiry cycle
description The article implements guided inquiry as a six-stage inquiry cycle from Liewelyin (2002): "(1) Inquisition - starting from the statement to be investigated, (2) Acquisition - enabling a brainstorming procedure, (3) Su...
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — margunayasa-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.