Skip to content

RAP strategy poster and instructional material folder for peer-tutoring sessions

Design · All designs
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

Each team received a folder containing a sticker collection sheet, a laminated RAP poster outlining the strategy steps, 26 informational texts graded from 100 to 300 words, and two types of notepaper (with and without boxes and lines). The article states the poster presented an expanded six-step sequence: "(1) Read a paragraph. (2) Clarify unknown words. (3) Ask yourself: What is the main idea of the paragraph? (4) Put the main idea in your own words. (5) Read the next paragraph. (6) And so on." Three intermediate steps were added to make the strategy more accessible to very low-performing tutees.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Materials must be handed out at the beginning of each session and collected at the end
  • Texts must be numbered serially and ordered by increasing length and difficulty

Constraints

  • The expanded six-step poster sequence modifies the original three-step RAP acronym to accommodate very low-performing tutees

Target Learners

  • fourth-grade tutees with severe reading comprehension difficulties
  • fourth-grade peer tutors

Learning Goals

  • applying the RAP strategy steps to expository paragraphs
  • clarifying unknown words before identifying main ideas

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Leidig, T., Grünke, M., Urton, K., Knaak, T., & Hisgen, S. (2018). The Effects of the RAP Strategy Used in a Peer-tutoring Setting to Foster Reading Comprehension in High-Risk Fourth Graders. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 231-253.
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id rap-peer-tutoring-material-folder
title RAP strategy poster and instructional material folder for peer-tutoring sessions
description Each team received a folder containing a sticker collection sheet, a laminated RAP poster outlining the strategy steps, 26 informational texts graded from 100 to 300 words, and two types of notepaper (with and without...
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — leidig-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.