RLO development process: storyboard, dual peer review, packaging and release¶

Design · All designs
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

The article describes a quality-controlled development process for RLOs based on a well established methodology. Storyboards (written templates of proposed content) were developed through an iterative development cycle, sent to experts for peer review prior to development, and after a prototype was built the RLOs went through "a second internal peer review by experts and evaluation by students" before packaging and release.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

Academic experts review storyboards for accuracy and appropriateness using a structured proforma
Second peer review assessing usability and appropriateness of media before release

Constraints¶

Target Learners¶

healthcare students who will use the resulting RLOs

Learning Goals¶

accurate, usable e-learning resources for difficult statistical concepts

Claims¶

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

Bath-Hextall Fiona, Wharrad Heather, Leonardi-Bee Jo. (2011). Teaching tools in Evidence Based Practice: evaluation of reusable learning objects (RLOs) for learning about Meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123313/

Page metadata

Field	Value
`type`	`design`
`id`	`rlo-storyboard-peer-review-development-process`
`title`	`RLO development process: storyboard, dual peer review, packaging and release`
`description`	`The article describes a quality-controlled development process for RLOs based on a well established methodology.`
`status`	`review`
`generated`	by `process:settle-candidates` on `2026-11-01`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
`sources`	1 — `bath-hextall-fiona-2011`

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.