Systematic reviews as intentional learning experiences scaffolded by mentoring that combines methodological guidance with emotional scaffolding¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The article frames systematic reviews "as intentional learning experiences that unfold across stages of the review and require mentoring and technological support." Mentoring is described as "an integrated support system that combined methodological guidance with emotional scaffolding" rather than solely procedural knowledge transmission. Mentoring was embedded across stages: guiding search refinement, joint discussion of borderline screening decisions, and collaborative coding, reducing the cognitive and emotional burden of evaluative judgments and supporting both technical competence and confidence.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Mentoring support embedded across multiple stages of the review process, or peer-based discussion groups when individual mentoring is not feasible
Constraints¶
- The account draws on one team's experience conducting an SR in the interdisciplinary LDT field; the authors position it as a practical guide for similarly complex fields
Target Learners¶
- graduate students and novice researchers conducting systematic reviews
Learning Goals¶
- systematic review methodology
- critical appraisal skills
- confidence in handling ambiguity and evaluative judgment
Claims¶
Related Designs¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Xiyu Wang, Fatemeh Dadashipour, Basori, Yukiko Maeda, & Jennifer C. Richardson. (2026). Scaffolding systematic reviews in learning design and technology through mentoring and AI integration. Educational technology research and development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10629-8
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
sr-as-intentional-learning-experience-mentoring |
title |
Systematic reviews as intentional learning experiences scaffolded by mentoring that combines methodological guidance with emotional scaffolding |
description |
The article frames systematic reviews "as intentional learning experiences that unfold across stages of the review and require mentoring and technological support." Mentoring is described as "an integrated support sys... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xiyu-wang-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.