Skip to content

Systematic reviews as intentional learning experiences scaffolded by mentoring that combines methodological guidance with emotional scaffolding

Design · All designs
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The article frames systematic reviews "as intentional learning experiences that unfold across stages of the review and require mentoring and technological support." Mentoring is described as "an integrated support system that combined methodological guidance with emotional scaffolding" rather than solely procedural knowledge transmission. Mentoring was embedded across stages: guiding search refinement, joint discussion of borderline screening decisions, and collaborative coding, reducing the cognitive and emotional burden of evaluative judgments and supporting both technical competence and confidence.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Mentoring support embedded across multiple stages of the review process, or peer-based discussion groups when individual mentoring is not feasible

Constraints

  • The account draws on one team's experience conducting an SR in the interdisciplinary LDT field; the authors position it as a practical guide for similarly complex fields

Target Learners

  • graduate students and novice researchers conducting systematic reviews

Learning Goals

  • systematic review methodology
  • critical appraisal skills
  • confidence in handling ambiguity and evaluative judgment

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Xiyu Wang, Fatemeh Dadashipour, Basori, Yukiko Maeda, & Jennifer C. Richardson. (2026). Scaffolding systematic reviews in learning design and technology through mentoring and AI integration. Educational technology research and development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10629-8
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id sr-as-intentional-learning-experience-mentoring
title Systematic reviews as intentional learning experiences scaffolded by mentoring that combines methodological guidance with emotional scaffolding
description The article frames systematic reviews "as intentional learning experiences that unfold across stages of the review and require mentoring and technological support." Mentoring is described as "an integrated support sys...
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — xiyu-wang-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.